Practitioners of student-centered learning will be familiar with the ‘jigsaw’. Jigsaws combine powerful collaborative strategies to increase retention and encourage construction of processes and concepts through critical thinking: 1) focused group discussion, and 2) teaching others. In the face-to-face environment, groups of 3 to 5 work together to solve a problem, explain a concept, or explore some idea or theory – together.

After the group (Expert group) has come to conclusions regarding the problem at hand, the groups are re-organized into mixed groups (Sharing group) – one member of each of the original groups, now work together. These new mixed groups are tasked with explaining their definition or solution to the rest of the group – effectively teaching the members of the mixed group. The jigsaw works well with groups between 9 and 25 but can be adapted in many ways to accommodate larger classes.

As Cornell University transitioned to emergency remote teaching, AEW facilitators immediately began training to continue supporting engineering student-learning in weekly student-centered online sessions. Emily Care and Juan Berrio, a pair of co-facilitators for CS 1112, decided they wanted to attempt this valuable teaching strategy to create engagement in their synchronous Zoom session. Here’s how they did it.

**Creating a Jigsaw in Breakout Rooms:**

**This scenario was developed for 2 weekly synchronous zoom meetings, rather than one, in order to accommodate different schedules of students now working online.**

- We briefly explained that
**students in the synchronous zoom would be placed in breakout room groups to create a solution and then split up into new groups to explain their solution.** - We then
**randomized the breakout rooms into groups of 2-3 students**and told each group their assigned question. - We gave them
**30 minutes to prepare their solution, check it with us,**and work on other questions. **After the 30 minutes, we reshuffled the breakout rooms**and let the students present to each other.

*****The facilitators were clear to note that leaders must be very active in visiting the breakout rooms on zoom while groups are working to be sure they are on the right track, without giving answers away**.

“The online jigsaw seemed to work well! All the students were able to have the solutionspresented to them from different perspectives, to hear different voices, and to work witharound 3 more students than they typically would have the opportunity to. They were alsomore thorough with the solutions they came up with since they knew they were responsiblefor the learning of their peers”. Emily Care, AEW Facilitator

**Jigsaw Adaptations**: The following recommendations come from an asynchronous discussion thread among AEW Facilitators in which they discussed different adaptations to improve jigsaw success for other course materials, other course online structure, and different numbers of students in class:

- Within each group, we would
**randomly assign a conversation leader to share a white board screen to encourage all to participate.**While checking over the solutions of each group we would also ask some students to explain their reasoning to ensure all members understand the material. - … But we would probably have to
**send the questions out during one of the Slack sessions before the zoom so that the students have a chance to work on them a little beforehand**, since our zoom sessions are only one hour a week. - …After the jigsaw groups had been redistributed,
**we could ask the members of each group leading questions concerning the concepts involved in the problem**, to ensure every person in each group gets the information to solve future questions. - … A good way to use jigsaw would be
**to use it for conceptual problems and not calculation-heavy ones, since students generally struggle more with concept application**and not flushed-out calculations in our class. - … Only having one zoom meeting per week, we would have
**to make sure that the problem was both in-depth enough to have students increase their understanding, but also short enough to be able to do in a manner where students feel confident**in their own abilities to present the material. - …
**Encourage the students to use canvas examples or the textbook to help them solve the questions.**Then check in with each group, shuffle the groups, and have the students teach others about their solution.

**Taking the next step: Following the synchronous Jigsaw with a concept map or an asynchronous discussion thread.**

**Jigsaws can be followed by ‘concept mapping’ activities**to bring all the different concepts and ideas back together into a framework, or if the work is problem-solving, then concept maps can bring problems and related series together.

- They
**can also be used to develop a challenge activity or problem that can be posted on an asynchronous discussion thread**. This would allow students to continue to engage while they’re not online together, and to answer each other’s questions. - In discussion threads
**it is critical that the facilitator is present, ‘listening’, and providing feedback and encouragement (not answers or solutions)**. After the discussion has run its course, clarifying the answer, approach and structure is important so that everybody knows they’re on the right track.

##### The ELI Edublog is brought to you by Engineering Learning Initiatives (ELI). Please contact us with any questions about our Blog or education articles or methodologies (cae223@cornell.edu)

#### Celia Ann Evans

Celia Ann Evans- The value of being a teaching assistant when teaching is not the chosen path: A reminder for graduate TAs - August 2, 2023
- Recognizing and Requesting Transparency in the College Classroom - February 24, 2023
- Do well on finals AND retain knowledge: Strategies for short and long-term success - November 26, 2022

Quick question: when you “reshuffled” on Zoom – did you just use their algorithm to do it, or did you manually re-do breakout groups on Zoom? I’ve been manually reshuffling, but it would be easier if I just let Zoom do it, but not sure it would work.

Jennifer, sorry for the slow response, its been TA training time here and I got pulled away from the blog! Thanks for asking. We also manually reshuffle. To be sure that one student from each original group ends up together in the 2nd set of ‘rooms’ so that all the original questions are represented, I don’t know how it could be done another way. You may do this already but one thing that makes the manual reshuffling easier is if you have 4 rooms, have the students rename themselves with the original room assignment in front of their name on zoom i.e.

‘2 – Jennifer Illuzzi’ ‘3 – Celia Evans’ so that in the second round it is easy to grab a 1,2,3, and 4 and just put them in the 2nd set of rooms. Im guessing you have found that way or some other to make it easier. Let me know please if you have found other fixes!! Very Best,

Celia